This is the potency challenge, part of the ASAP Discovery x OpenADMET competition.
Potency
Likely the most popular prediction for computational modellers. Although it's an important feature, as we can see in ASAP's TCP it only tells a part of the story. You will predict potency for both Mpro targets.
đ Data
The training set will have the following variables:
| Column | Dtype | Description |
|---|
| Molecule Name | str | Internal identifier at ASAP Discovery for this molecule |
| CXSMILES | str | Text representation of the 2D molecular structure |
| pIC50 (SARS-CoV-2 Mpro) | float | Negative log10 of the IC50 values of the dose-response curve |
| pIC50 (MERS-CoV Mpro) | float | Negative log10 of the IC50 values of the dose-response curve |
At test time, we will only provide the CXSMILES.
You will be able to download the train and test set through Polaris as if it's any other benchmark.
âšī¸ Sample data and raw data
Through Polaris, we will provide a ML-ready dataset that can be easily used in ML applications. You can find a sample dataset for this challenge here. This allows teams to prepare dataloaders and other utilities.
import polaris as po
po.load_dataset('asap-discovery/antiviral-potency-2025-sample')
We've sacrificed the completeness of the scientific data to improve ease of use. However, for those that are interested, you can also access the raw data package that this dataset has been created from here.
âī¸ Split
We used a temporal split.
đ¨ Prepare your submission
We welcome submissions of any kind, including machine learning and physics based approaches. You can employ pre-training approaches as you see fit. You are also free to reuse data from one portion of the challenge for others if it will assist you.
The format of this submission will be a dict, mapping targets to predictions:
{
'pIC50 (SARS-CoV-2 Mpro)': [0.1, 0.2, ..., 0.9],
'pIC50 (MERS-CoV Mpro)': [0.1, 0.2, ..., 0.9],
}
You will submit your predictions directly through the Polaris API. We will provide a complete code example when the competition launches.
â
Evaluation criteria
The competition will be judged based on the judging criteria outlined here.
- You must provide predictions for both Mpro targets.
- We will evaluate your submission using an ensemble score of ranking (Kendall's tau) and mean absolute error of predicted endpoint_
- You can enter as many times as desired, but we will only evaluate your last submission.
- In the open science spirit of ASAP Discovery we would love to see open code showing how you created your submission if possible. If not, we require at least a written report.
âšī¸ Overall competition winner
We will also elect an overall competition winner. This will be based on participants' performance on all subchallenges (entry to all required).
đ Prizes
For each sub challenge we will select a champion. To be eligible for ADMET subchallenge champion you must provide predictions for every endpoint.
In addition to eternal glory, the champions and winner will have the opportunity to present their work at the NIH AViDD ASAP Open Science Forum https://asapdiscovery.org/forum, one of the peak groups in antiviral drug discovery. Additionally we will be offering some Polaris merch packs. We will also be writing our conclusions up as a paper, to which all submitting teams are invited to share co-authorship.
About the ASAP Discovery x OpenADMET competition
ASAP Discovery is an NIH-funded consortium leveraging open science for antiviral drug discovery, with the goal of equitable and affordable global access to effective antivirals. ASAP has pursued several programs and targets, the most advanced being ASAP's dual SARS-CoV-2 and MERS-CoV main protease (Mpro) program, which has reached preclinical candidate nomination. You can see a full list of ASAP's programs on the website.
ASAP Discovery is passionate about open science and has put a huge amount of effort into sharing its outputs in a digestible way with the community. For example, if you navigate to ASAP's website, the drug discovery pipeline is fully interactive for users. Clicking any filled box will navigate you to the continuously published data for those experiments, and experimental protocols used.
ASAP Discovery is approaching a patent disclosure for its preclinical candidates for its two coronavirus Mpro drug discovery programs see blogpost for a high-level overview. There is a batch of data in these projects that ASAP Discovery has not publicly disclosed at this point; this will be the blind test data of this challenge. The blind challenge will mirror some of the real-world drug discovery challenges that ASAP has had to overcome in the last three years: we would love to challenge the community with the same hurdles that we've had to overcome during this process - can you use your models to solve these problems better than we have? You will be working with active and real drug discovery data that is normally restricted to large pharmaceutical companies!
The ASAP Discovery Consortium group meeting in NYC May 2023
All subchallenges:
Timeline
- Sample data released: December 3 (2024)
- Challenge start: Jan 13 (2025)
- Jan-Feb: Walk in online sessions (2025)
- Challenge end: March 10 (2025)
- Winners announced: March 25 (2025)
Endpoints included in this challenge
We have designed this challenge to let you experience a diverse set of computational drug discovery problems that are pivotal in pushing the pharmaceutical decision-making process forward. To understand the typical medicinal-chemistry way of thinking about making a preclinical candidate, it's best to start at the top. Target Candidate Profiles (TCPs) are internal documents that pharmaceutical companies draw up that set a series of goals or must-haves (and sometimes nice-to-haves) that the intended preclininical candidate must have. With ASAP, these are public. Our SARS-CoV-2/MERS-Mpro dual inhibitor TCP is available here. You'll see there are many goals: the set of goals and their values depend heavily on the target indication (the disease that we're trying to treat).
You'll also notice that potency (IC50 or Kd) is only a small part of this TCP. That is typical: in close-to-preclinical stages such as lead optimization, potency is not the main challenge anymore. Rather, the challenge is to balance a wide array of more complex parameters such as cell potency, formulation, pharmacokinetics/dynamics and safety. These are all part of the 'assay cascade': promisingly potent lead molecules are subjected to a first tier of affordable follow-up assays. Ones that come out of those assays as acceptable (i.e. within the bounds of the TCP requirements) are followed up on in subsequent assay tiers. In this way, lead molecules follow the cascade from simple biochemical potency assays all the way to more involved assays and ultimately animal studies.
